Another year of Redskins dreams dashed, another winter to wonder what if... despite the last-second win over Philadelphia this is a team that is going nowhere for the seventh time in nine years. From offseason expectations (all ten draft picks making the roster) to preseason disaster (the late August collapse that saw the Skins fall 71-6 over their last two exhibitions), from early season surprise (4-1 with road wins over Dallas and Philadelphia) to late season slip (the Cincinnati debacle), the 2008 campaign was nothing if not entertaining.
Where does this team go from here? Is the best case a win at San Francisco and a 9-7 finish or will it just foster a false sense of security that things are moving in the right direction? And even with a defeat and an 8-8 mark who says this team isn't on the right track?
As this team is currently built there are major needs on the offensive and defensive lines that need addressing--a good football team is like a nice meal, and for years the Skins have had incredible creamed spinach (Portis) as well as phenomenal Lyonnaise potatoes (Sean Taylor and now LaRon Landry)--but the steak (both lines) is far from prime...and sometimes borders on standard/substandard. Injuries and age are taking their toll while the team hasn't replenished either unit in the draft...with Derrick Dockery the lone top-95 offensive line selection since 2000. The last defensive lineman taken in the first four rounds? Try Kenard Lang in 1997. In each of the last two seasons covering the draft I was surprised at the lack of attention given to bolstering both units.
Receiver revisionism...the second round triumvirate of Devin Thomas, Malcolm Kelly and Fred Davis never got in gear after Davis overslept an alarm in OTA's before Thomas and Kelly suffered injuries in training camp. But should this be a surprise? In a pre-draft press conference, coach Jim Zorn talked about the learning curve facing rookie receivers and how it was a challenge for them to be productive immediately--which made the selection of three receivers so high such an intriguing decision.
Looking around the league:
AFC surge reverses trend...last year for the first time since the late 90's, the NFC actually won as many interconference games as the AFC (32-32) and throughout September it appeared as though the NFC would dominate-- but over the last few months the AFC has actually taken a 32-29-1 lead...meaning once again the National Football Conference is once again looking up at their rivals.
NFC Beast? Never before has a division boasted four teams with winning records--although the NFC East's last place squad finished 8-8 last year (Philadelphia). This fall we could have two divisions where every team is over .500 (if New Orleans and Washington both win) and two where the division champ is .500...more on them in a moment.
Divisions of Depression? No chance of an east-coast bias; both the NFC and AFC Wests were putrid this past fall...the only question is which was the worst division in pro football. Although the AFC West has a better cumulative record (by one game) added with Arizona's collapse (1-4 since Thanksgiving night) plus St. Louis's free fall (nine straight losses), I can't deny the AFC West as the worst---a division led by a team that can't play defense (Denver), followed by one that is being coached well under its talent (San Diego) plus two massive disasters--one short-term (Carl Peterson's era in Kansas City concluding with a thud) and one with a feeling of forever (or at least until Al Davis lets someone else run Oakland).
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment